Save the puppies, free the market Free market allows for education of puppy mill cruelty better than legislation4 min read

Originally published in the Rio Rancho Observer

Save the puppies, free the market

PETA, the ASPCA and the Humane Society are organizations well-known for animal advocacy and have led the way in raising public awareness regarding the treatment of animals in fashion, product testing, meat consumption and pet welfare. Because of these campaigns, it’s now socially unacceptable to wear fur, use animal-tested products and consume caged and/or genetically-engineered animals. “Animal Welfare Approved,” “Certified Humane” and “Leaping Bunny” are third-party certifications coveted by humane business owners.

These programs didn’t evolve because of legislative regulations, but because of consumer regulation: a unique characteristic of the free market. Consumer regulation has proven to be more effective in keeping unsavory business practices at bay.

Prohibitionist laws only handicap those who’re neither inclined nor determined to commit the behavior the law is intended to curtail. In other words, banning the sale of animals in pet stores only stops those who wouldn’t sell inhumanely-treated animals; those who would will find another venue, usually the black market where more cruelty takes place.

One opponent of this change stated that, “Just because you don’t see (cruelty) doesn’t mean it’s not there.” I agree, adding that just because you don’t see the sale of puppy mill puppies in pet stores, doesn’t mean that sale isn’t taking place.

Bans end the conversation, creating ignorant consumers rather than educated and informed consumers. I would hope that a hallmark of the City of Vision is that consumers here are informed and educated rather than ignorant, something only the free market can do.


Kerry Baldwin |  

Thanks for reading my post! Add your thoughts and comments by contacting me below, or you can interact with me and my patrons by becoming a premium member at


In lieu of a comments section

I welcome and encourage your thoughts, comments, and questions through email.

10 + 7 =


Unlock Premium Features

As a premium feature, my patrons and I can enjoy ongoing dialogue. To join us and get other premium features, click here

Follow Mere Liberty


Patrons Sign In

Related Posts

What is Praxeology? The study of human action

Praxeology comes from the Greek; it means the study of deed, or action. It's actually a broad discipline where human action is understood deductively. This leads to conclusions that are a priori, or self-evident. Today, praxeology is most often associated with...

The Problem with Black Market Economics Origin of both its existence and problems

The term ‘black market’ has a negative connotation to it and with relatively good reason. It’s often associated with transactions relating to illicit drug use, firearms sales, and prostitution. However, the negative implication of the black market is due to its being “unregulated’ by the government. It exists outside the law and therefore it must be the law that has the black market unsafe safe. While it’s true that government regulation of the market influences the operation of the black market, it’s not true that the government keeps us safe through regulation.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This